Network position, governance role of independent directors and corporate violation of rules: Using a Bivariate Probit model with partial observability
WAN Liang-yong1,2, DENG Lu3, ZHENG Xiao-ling1
1. School of Business Administration, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China; 2. Guanghua School of Management, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China; 3. School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100191, China
Abstract:Researching the governance role of independent directors on the network view is an updated field of corporate governance. Using the Bivariate Probit model, this study investigates the influence of network position of independent directors on corporate violation of rules. Independent directors with rich network relationships can possess more social capital to improve their motivation and ability of monitoring, which will reduce the possibility of corporate violation of rules. Consistent with theoretical analysis, the result shows that the network centrality of independent directors has significantly negative relationship with the propensity of corporate violation of rules. The study reveals that network of independent directors has positive influence on their monitoring roles. The complementary tests show that the active effect of independent director networks exists in the aspect of information disclosure fraud, but not in the aspect of other kinds of fraud; networks of independent directors entering audit committees have active effect, but others have not; the active effect of independent director networks is more significant in firms with worse profitability. This paper complements the literature of independent directors, board networks and corporate violation of rules.
万良勇, 邓路, 郑小玲. 网络位置、独立董事治理与公司违规——基于部分可观测Bivariate Probit模型[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2014, 34(12): 3091-3102.
WAN Liang-yong, DENG Lu, ZHENG Xiao-ling. Network position, governance role of independent directors and corporate violation of rules: Using a Bivariate Probit model with partial observability. Systems Engineering - Theory & Practice, 2014, 34(12): 3091-3102.
[1] 张翼, 马光. 法律、公司治理与公司丑闻[J]. 管理世界, 2005(10): 113-122.Zhang Yi, Ma Guang. Law, corporate governance and corporate scandals[J]. Management World, 2005(10): 113-122. [2] Chen G, Firth M, Gao D N, et al. Ownership structure, corporate governance and fraud: Evidence from China[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2006, 12(3): 424-448. [3] 蔡志岳, 吴世农. 董事会特征影响上市公司违规行为的实证研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2007, 10(6): 62-68.Cai Zhiyue, Wu Shinong. The empirical study on behavior of committing fraud in listed companies: Evidence from the characteristics of board of directors[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2007, 10(6): 62-68. [4] 诺克, 杨松. 社会网络分析[M]. 2版. 上海: 格致出版社、上海人民出版社, 2012.Knoke D, Yang Song. Social network analysis[M]. 2nd ed. Shanghai: Shanghai People's Publishing House, Truth&Wisdom Press, 2012. [5] 谢德仁, 陈运森. 董事网络: 定义、特征和计量[J]. 会计研究, 2012(3): 44-51.Xie Deren, Chen Yunsen. Network position: The definition, characteristic and measurement[J]. Accounting Research, 2012(3): 44-51. [6] 卢昌崇, 陈仕华. 断裂联结重构: 连锁董事及其组织功能[J]. 管理世界, 2009(5): 52-62.Lu Changchong, Chen Shihua. The reestablishment of ties: The interlocking directorate and their organizational functions[J]. Management World, 2009(5): 52-62. [7] 陈运森, 谢德仁. 网络位置、独立董事治理与投资效率[J]. 管理世界, 2011(7): 113-127.Chen Yunsen, Xie Deren. Network position, governance role of independent directors and investment efficiency[J]. Management World, 2011(7): 113-127. [8] Cai Y, Sevilir M. Board connections and M&A transactions[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2012, 103(2): 327-349. [9] Larcker D F, So E C, Wang C C Y. Boardroom centrality and firm performance[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2013, 55(2): 225-250. [10] 李留闯, 田高良. 公司关系网络和高管薪酬[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2014, 34(1): 54-63.Li Liuchuang, Tian Gaoliang. Relationship network of firms and executive compensation: Theoretical model and empirical findings[J]. Systems Engineering - Theory & Practice, 2014, 34(1): 54-63. [11] 陈国进, 林辉, 王磊. 公司治理、声誉机制和上市公司违法违规行为分析[J]. 南开管理评论, 2005, 8(6): 35-40.Chen Guojin, Lin Hui, Wang Lei. Corporate governance, reputation mechanism and the behavior of listed firms in committing in fraud[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2005, 8(6): 35-40. [12] 唐跃军. 大股东制衡、违规行为与外部监管——来自2004-2005年上市公司的证据[J]. 南开经济研究, 2007(6): 106-117.Tang Yuejun. Blockholders counterbalance, illegal behaviors and external supervision: Evidence from listed companies from 2004 to 2005[J]. Nankai Economic Studies, 2007(6): 106-117. [13] 陆瑶, 朱玉杰, 胡晓元. 机构投资者持股与上市公司违规行为的实证研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2012, 15(1): 13-23.Lu Yao, Zhu Yujie, Hu Xiaoyuan. Institutional shareholding and corporate fraud: Evidence from China[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2012, 15(1): 13-23. [14] 叶康涛, 陆正飞, 张志华. 独立董事能否抑制大股东的"掏空"?[J]. 经济研究, 2007(4): 101-111.Ye Kangtao, Lu Zhengfei, Zhang Zhihua. Can independent directors deter the tunneling of large shareholders?[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2007(4): 101-111. [15] 赵德武, 曾力, 谭莉川. 独立董事监督力与盈余稳健性——基于中国上市公司的实证研究[J]. 会计研究, 2008(9): 55-63.Zhao Dewu, Zeng Li, Tan Lichuan. Supervision of independent directors and earning conservatism: An empirical study based on Chinese listed firms[J]. Accounting Research, 2008(9): 55-63. [16] 胡奕明, 唐松莲. 独立董事与上市公司盈余信息质量[J]. 管理世界, 2008(9): 149-160.Hu Yiming, Tang Songlian. The relationship between independent directors and the quality of the information about listed companies' earnings[J]. Management World, 2008(9): 149-160. [17] 王兵. 独立董事监督了吗? ——基于中国上市公司盈余质量的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2007(1): 109-121.Wang Bing. Can independent directors perform regulatory duty?[J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2007(1): 109-121. [18] Fama E F, Jenson M C. Separation of ownership and control[J]. Journal of Law and Economics, 1983, 26: 301-325. [19] Krackhardt D. The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations[M]// Nohria N, Eccles R. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1992: 216-239. [20] Lin N. Social capital: A theory of social structure and action[M]. Cambridge University Press, 2002. [21] Cashman G D, Gillan S L, Whitby R. Expertise, connections and the labor market for corporate directors: Is it what you know or who you know?[R]. Working Paper, Texas Tech University, 2010. [22] Adams R B, Ferreira D. A theory of friendly boards[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2007, 62(1): 217-250. [23] Duchin R, Matsusaka J G, Ozbas O. When are outside directors effective?[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2010, 96(2): 195-214. [24] Kang E, Tan B R. Accounting choice and director interlocks: A social network approach to the voluntary expensing of stock option grants[J]. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 2008, 35(9): 1079-1102. [25] 魏刚, 肖泽忠, Nick Travlos, 等. 独立董事背景与公司经营绩效[J]. 经济研究, 2007(3): 92-105.Wei Gang, Xiao Zezhong, Travlos N, et al. Background of independent directors and corporate performance[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2007(3): 92-105. [26] Poirier D J. Partial observability in bivariate Probit models[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1980, 12(2): 209-217. [27] 罗家德. 社会网分析讲义[M]. 2版.北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2010.Luo Jiade. Social network analysis[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press, 2010. [28] 陈运森, 谢德仁. 董事网络、独立董事治理与高管激励[J]. 金融研究, 2012(2): 168-182.Chen Yunsen, Xie Deren. Network position, governance role of independent directors and executive compensation[J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2012(2): 168-182. [29] 王跃堂, 朱林, 陈世敏. 董事会独立性、股权制衡与财务信息质量[J]. 会计研究, 2008(1): 55-62.Wang Yuetang, Zhu Lin, Chen Shimin. Board's independence, ownership balance and financial information quality[J]. Accounting Research, 2008(1): 55-62. [30] 俞伟峰, 朱凯, 王红梅, 等. 管制下的独立董事: 不求有功, 但求无过——基于中国独立董事制度的经验分析[J]. 中国会计与财务研究, 2010, 12(3): 107-128.Yu Weifeng, Zhu Kai, Wang Hongmei, et al. Playing safe on the board: The role of independent directors: Evidence from listed firms in China[J]. China Accounting and Finance Review, 2010, 12(3): 107-128.