|镇璐1, 诸葛丹2, 汪小帆1
|1. 上海大学 管理学院, 上海 200444;
2. 香港理工大学 商学院 物流及航运学系, 香港 999077
|Researches on green ports and shipping management: An overview
|ZHEN Lu1, ZHUGE Dan2, WANG Xiaofan1
|1. School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China;
2. Department of Logistics and Maritime Studies, Faculty of Business, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, China
|  UNCTAD. Review of maritime transportation[R]. The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 2018.
 IMO. Third IMO GHG study 2014:Executive summary and final report[R]. International Maritime Organization, 2015.
 Correcher J F, Van den Bossche T, Alvarez-Valdes R, et al. The berth allocation problem in terminals with irregular layouts[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2019, 272(3):1096-1108.
 Sun D, Tang L, Baldacci R. A benders decomposition-based framework for solving quay crane scheduling problems[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2019, 273(2):504-515.
 Correcher J F, Alvarez-Valdes R, Tamarit J M. New exact methods for the time-invariant berth allocation and quay crane assignment problem[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2018, 275(1):80-92.
 Galle V, Barnhart C, Jaillet P. Yard crane scheduling for container storage, retrieval, and relocation[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2018, 271(1):288-316.
 Peng Y, Wang W, Song X, et al. Optimal allocation of resources for yard crane network management to minimize carbon dioxide emissions[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 131:649-658.
 Tang L, Zhao J, Liu J. Modeling and solution of the joint quay crane and truck scheduling problem[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2014, 236(3):978-990.
 Du Y, Chen Q, Lam J S L, et al. Modeling the impacts of tides and the virtual arrival policy in berth allocation[J]. Transportation Science, 2015, 49(4):939-956.
 Venturini G, Iris Ç, Kontovas C A, et al. The multi-port berth allocation problem with speed optimization and emission considerations[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2017, 54:142-159.
 Hou J. Dynamic berth allocation problem with two types of shore power for containership based on rolling horizon strategy[C]//20172nd IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Engineering (ICITE), Singapore, 2017:144-149.
 Dulebenets M A, Moses R, Ozguven E E, et al. Minimizing carbon dioxide emissions due to container handling at marine container terminals via hybrid evolutionary algorithms[J]. IEEE Access, 2017, 5:8131-8147.
 He J, Huang Y, Yan W, et al. Integrated internal truck, yard crane and quay crane scheduling in a container terminal considering energy consumption[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2015, 42(5):2464-2487.
 He J. Berth allocation and quay crane assignment in a container terminal for the trade-off between time-saving and energy-saving[J]. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2016, 30(3):390-405.
 Yu S, Wang S, Zhen L. Quay crane scheduling problem with considering tidal impact and fuel consumption[J]. Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, 2016, 29(3-4):345-368.
 Talavera A M, Barron J G G, Passamani C M T C. Optimization of vessel and quay crane emissions during the hoteling phase[C]//2016 7th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems & Applications (ⅡSA), Chalkidiki, 2016:1-10.
 de Oliveira J P R, Barbosa J D, Lamprou M. Multi-objective optimization of the quay crane assignment and scheduling problem:Time and movement optimization[C]//2016 7th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems & Applications (ⅡSA), Chalkidiki, 2016:1-7.
 Liu D, Ge Y E. Modeling assignment of quay cranes using queueing theory for minimizing CO2 emission at a container terminal[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2018, 61:140-151.
 Woo J K, Moon D S, Lam J S L. The impact of environmental policy on ports and the associated economic opportunities[J]. Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice, 2018, 110:234-242.
 Tseng P H, Pilcher N. Evaluating the key factors of green port policies in Taiwan through quantitative and qualitative approaches[J]. Transport Policy, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.12.014.
 Di Vaio A, Varriale L. Management innovation for environmental sustainability in seaports:Managerial accounting instruments and training for competitive green ports beyond the regulations[J]. Sustainability, 2018, 10(3):783.
 Diaz-Hernandez G, Losada I J, Mendez F J. Improving construction management of port infrastructures using an advanced computer-based system[J]. Automation in Construction, 2017, 81:122-133.
 Na J H, Choi A Y, Ji J, et al. Environmental efficiency analysis of Chinese container ports with CO2 emissions:An inseparable input-output SBM model[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2017, 65:13-24.
 Zheng S, Ge Y E, Fu X, et al. Modeling collusion-proof port emission regulation of cargo-handling activities under incomplete information[J]. Transportation Research Part B:Methodological, 2017, 104:543-567.
 Kang D, Kim S. Conceptual model development of sustainability practices:The case of port operations for collaboration and governance[J]. Sustainability, 2017, 9(12):2333. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122333.
 Kim S, Chiang B G. The role of sustainability practices in international port operations:An analysis of moderation effect[J]. Journal of Korea Trade, 2017, 21(2):125-144.
 de Moura D A, de Andrade D G. Concepts of green port operations-One kind of self-diagnosis method to the port of Santos-Brazil[J]. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 2018, 9(3):785-809.
 Peng Y, Wang W, Liu K, et al. The impact of the allocation of facilities on reducing carbon emissions from a green container terminal perspective[J]. Sustainability, 2018, 10(6):1813. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061813.
 Lam J S L, Notteboom T. The greening of ports:A comparison of port management tools used by leading ports in Asia and Europe[J]. Transport Reviews, 2014, 34(2):169-189.
 Erdas C, Fokaides P A, Charalambous C. Ecological footprint analysis based awareness creation for energy efficiency and climate change mitigation measures enhancing the environmental management system of Limassol port[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 108:716-724.
 García-Onetti J, Scherer M E, Barragán J M. Integrated and ecosystemic approaches for bridging the gap between environmental management and port management[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2018, 206:615-624.
 Asgari N, Hassani A, Jones D, et al. Sustainability ranking of the UK major ports:Methodology and case study[J]. Transportation research part E:Logistics and Transportation Review, 2015, 78:19-39.
 Wan C, Zhang D, Yan X, et al. A novel model for the quantitative evaluation of green port development-A case study of major ports in China[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2018, 61:431-443.
 Puig M, Wooldridge C, Casal J, et al. Tool for the identification and assessment of environmental aspects in ports (TEAP)[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2015, 113:8-17.
 Yang Y C. Determinants of container terminal operation from a green port perspective[J]. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 2015, 7(3):319-346.
 Chang Y T, Park H. Measuring foregone output under industry emission reduction target in the transportation sector[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2016, 49:138-153.
 Antão P, Calderón M, Puig M, et al. Identification of occupational health, safety, security (OHSS) and environmental performance indicators in port areas[J]. Safety Science, 2016, 85:266-275.
 Papaefthimiou S, Sitzimis I, Andriosopoulos K. A methodological approach for environmental characterization of ports[J]. Maritime Policy & Management, 2017, 44(1):81-93.
 Laxe F G, Bermúdez F M, Palmero F M, et al. Assessment of port sustainability through synthetic indexes. Application to the Spanish case[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2017, 119(1):220-225.
 Di Vaio A, Varriale L, Alvino F. Key performance indicators for developing environmentally sustainable and energy efficient ports:Evidence from Italy[J]. Energy Policy, 2018, 122:229-240.
 Sim J. A carbon emission evaluation model for a container terminal[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 186:526-533.
 Ballini F, Bozzo R. Air pollution from ships in ports:The socio-economic benefit of cold-ironing technology[J]. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 2015, 17:92-98.
 Tseng P H, Pilcher N. A study of the potential of shore power for the port of Kaohsiung, Taiwan:To introduce or not to introduce?[J]. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 2015, 17:83-91.
 Sciberras E A, Zahawi B, Atkinson D J. Electrical characteristics of cold ironing energy supply for berthed ships[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2015, 39:31-43.
 Kotrikla A M, Lilas T, Nikitakos N. Abatement of air pollution at an Aegean island port utilizing shore side electricity and renewable energy[J]. Marine Policy, 2017, 75:238-248.
 Vaishnav P, Fischbeck P S, Morgan M G, et al. Shore power for vessels calling at US ports:Benefits and costs[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 50(3):1102-1110.
 Winkel R, Weddige U, Johnsen D, et al. Shore side electricity in Europe:Potential and environmental benefits[J]. Energy Policy, 2016, 88:584-593.
 Innes A, Monios J. Identifying the unique challenges of installing cold ironing at small and medium ports-The case of Aberdeen[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2018, 62:298-313.
 Zis T. Prospects of cold ironing as an emissions reduction option[J]. Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice, 2019, 119:82-95.
 Alasali F, Haben S, Becerra V, et al. Optimal energy management and MPC strategies for electrified RTG cranes with energy storage systems[J]. Energies, 2017, 10(10):1598.
 Antonelli M, Ceraolo M, Desideri U, et al. Hybridization of rubber tired gantry (RTG) cranes[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2017, 12:186-195.
 Jonathan Y C E, Kader S B A. Prospect of emission reduction standard for sustainable port equipment electrification[J]. International Journal of Engineering, 2018, 31(8):1347-1355.
 Piris A O, Díaz-Ruiz-Navamuel E, Pérez-Labajos C A, et al. Reduction of CO2 emissions with automatic mooring systems. The case of the port of Santander[J]. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 2018, 9(1):76-83.
 Díaz-Ruiz-Navamuel E, Piris A O, Pérez-Labajos C A. Reduction in CO2 emissions in RoRo/Pax ports equipped with automatic mooring systems[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2018, 241:879-886.
 Ramos V, Carballo R, álvarez M, et al. A port towards energy self-sufficiency using tidal stream power[J]. Energy, 2014, 71:432-444.
 Lamberti T, Sorce A, Di Fresco L, et al. Smart port:Exploiting renewable energy and storage potential of moored boats[C]//OCEANS 2015-Genova, 2015:1-3.
 Lam J S L, Ko M J, Sim J R, et al. Feasibility of implementing energy management system in ports[C]//2017 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), Singapore, 2017:1621-1625.
 Zhao Q, Xu H, Wall R S, et al. Building a bridge between port and city:Improving the urban competitiveness of port cities[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2017, 59:120-133.
 Al-Falahi M D, Nimma K S, Jayasinghe S D, et al. Power management optimization of hybrid power systems in electric ferries[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 172:50-66.
 Li N, Chen G, Govindan K, et al. Disruption management for truck appointment system at a container terminal:A green initiative[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2018, 61:261-273.
 Bae H Y, Choe R, Park T, et al. Comparison of operations of AGVs and ALVs in an automated container terminal[J]. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2011, 22(3):413-426.
 Rashidi H, Tsang E P. A complete and an incomplete algorithm for automated guided vehicle scheduling in container terminals[J]. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 2011, 61(3):630-641.
 Pjevčević D, Vladisavljević I, Vukadinović K, et al. Application of DEA to the analysis of AGV fleet operations in a port container terminal[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2011, 20:816-825.
 Skinner B, Yuan S, Huang S, et al. Optimisation for job scheduling at automated container terminals using genetic algorithm[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2013, 64(1):511-523.
 Xin J, Negenborn R R, Lodewijks G. Energy-aware control for automated container terminals using integrated flow shop scheduling and optimal control[J]. Transportation Research Part C:Emerging Technologies, 2014, 44:214-230.
 Hu H, Zhang Y, Wang T, et al. A three-stage decomposition method for the joint vehicle dispatching and storage allocation problem in automated container terminals[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2019, 129:90-101.
 Lee T, Nam H. A study on green shipping in major countries:In the view of shipyards, shipping companies, ports, and policies[J]. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 2017, 33(4):253-262.
 Ronen D. Cargo ships routing and scheduling:Survey of models and problems[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1983, 12(2):119-126.
 Ronen D. Ship scheduling:The last decade[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1993, 71(3):325-333.
 Christiansen M, Fagerholt K, Ronen D. Ship routing and scheduling:Status and perspectives[J]. Transportation Science, 2004, 38(1):1-18.
 Christiansen M, Fagerholt K, Nygreen B, et al. Ship routing and scheduling in the new millennium[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2013, 228(3):467-483.
 Meng Q, Wang S, Andersson H, et al. Containership routing and scheduling in liner shipping:Overview and future research directions[J]. Transportation Science, 2014, 48(2):265-280.
 Tran N K, Haasis H D. Literature survey of network optimization in container liner shipping[J]. Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, 2015, 27:139-179.
 Lee C Y, Song D P. Ocean container transport in global supply chains:Overview and research opportunities[J]. Transportation Research Part B:Methodological, 2017, 95:442-474.
 Wang S, Meng Q. Sailing speed optimization for container ships in a liner shipping network[J]. Transportation Research Part E:Logistics and Transportation Review, 2012, 48(3):701-714.
 Corbett J J, Wang H, Winebrake J J. The effectiveness and costs of speed reductions on emissions from international shipping[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2009, 14(8):593-598.
 Psaraftis H N, Kontovas C A. Balancing the economic and environmental performance of maritime transportation[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2010, 15:458-462.
 Cariou P. Is slow steaming a sustainable means of reducing CO2 emissions from container shipping?[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2011, 16:260-264.
 Kontovas C, Psaraftis H N. Reduction of emissions along the maritime intermodal container chain:Operational models and policies[J]. Maritime Policy and Management, 2011, 38(4):451-469.
 Chang C C, Chang C H. Energy conservation for international dry bulk carriers via vessel speed reduction[J]. Energy Policy, 2013, 50:710-715.
 Maloni M, Paul J A, Gligor D M. Slow steaming impacts on ocean carriers and shippers[J]. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 2013, 15(2):151-171.
 Woo J K, Moon D S H. The effects of slow steaming on the environmental performance in liner shipping[J]. Maritime Policy & Management, 2014, 41(2):176-191.
 Chang C C, Wang C M. Evaluating the effects of speed reduce for shipping costs and CO2 emission[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2014, 31:110-115.
 Lee C Y, Lee H L, Zhang J. The impact of slow ocean steaming on delivery reliability and fuel consumption[J]. Transportation Research Part E:Logistics and Transportation Review, 2015, 76:176-190.
 Ferrari C, Parola F, Tei A. Determinants of slow steaming and implications on service patterns[J]. Maritime Policy & Management, 2015, 42(7):636-652.
 Ammar N R. Energy- and cost-efficiency analysis of greenhouse gas emission reduction using slow steaming of ships:Case study RO-RO cargo vessel[J]. Ships and Offshore Structures, 2018, 13(8):868-876.
 Cariou P, Parola F, Notteboom T. Towards low carbon global supply chains:A multi-trade analysis of CO2 emission reductions in container shipping[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2019, 208:17-28.
 Gausel N T. Optimal ship speed and routing when considering ECA regulations[D]. Norway:Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2014.
 Panasiuk I, Lebedevas S. The assessment of the possibilities for the Lithuanian fleet to comply with new environmental requirements[J]. Transport, 2014, 29(1):50-58.
 Patricksson O S, Fagerholt K, Rakke J G. The fleet renewal problem with regional emission limitations:Case study from roll-on/roll-off shipping[J]. Transportation Research Part C:Emerging Technologies, 2015, 56:346-358.
 Carr E W, Corbett J J. Ship compliance in Emission Control Areas:Technology costs and policy instruments[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49:9584-9591.
 Panasiuk I, Turkina L. The evaluation of investments efficiency of SOx scrubber installation[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2015, 40:87-96.
 Antturi J, Hänninen O, Jalkanen J P, et al. Costs and benefits of low-sulphur fuel standard for Baltic Sea shipping[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2016, 184:431-440.
 Zis T, Angeloudis P, Bell M G H, et al. Payback period for emissions abatement alternatives-Role of regulation and fuel prices[J]. Transportation Research Record:Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2016, 2549(1):37-44.
 Zhu M, Li K X, Shi W, et al. Incentive policy for reduction of emission from ships:A case study of China[J]. Marine Policy, 2017, 86:253-258.
 Abadie L M, Goicoechea N, Galarraga I. Adapting the shipping sector to stricter emissions regulations:Fuel switching or installing a scrubber?[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2017, 57:237-250.
 Lindstad H E, Rehn C F, Eskeland G S. Sulphur abatement globally in maritime shipping[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2017, 57:303-313.
 Solakivi T, Laari S, Kiiski T, et al. How shipowners have adapted to sulphur regulations-Evidence from Finnish seaborne trade[J]. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 2019, 7:338-345.
 Kim K, An J, Park K, et al. Analysis of a supercapacitor/battery hybrid power system for a bulk carrier[J]. Applied Sciences, 2019, 9(8):1547. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9081547.
 Van T C, Ramirez J, Rainey T, et al. Global impacts of recent IMO regulations on marine fuel oil refining processes and ship emissions[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2019, 70:123-134.
 Ren J, Lützen M. Selection of sustainable alternative energy source for shipping:Multicriteria decision making under incomplete information[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 74:1003-1019.
 Annouch A, Bellabdaoui A. Gas-filling stations procurement problem with time windows using a heterogeneous fleet of full tankers[C]//2015 10th International Conference on Intelligent Systems:Theories and Applications (SITA), Rabat, 2015:1-6.
 Sharafian A, Blomerus P, Mérida W. Natural gas as a ship fuel:Assessment of greenhouse gas and air pollutant reduction potential[J]. Energy Policy, 2019, 131:332-346.
 Nikopoulou Z, Cullinane K, Jensen A. The role of a cap-and-trade market in reducing NOx and SOx emissions:Prospects and benefits for ships within the Northern European ECA[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M:Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 2013, 227(2):136-154.
 Brynolf S, Magnusson M, Fridell E, et al. Compliance possibilities for the future ECA regulations through the use of abatement technologies or change of fuels[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2014, 28:6-18.
 Lindstad H, Sandaas I, Stromman A H. Assessment of cost as a function of abatement options in maritime emission control areas[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2015, 38:41-48.
 Ren J, Lützen M. Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method for technology selection for emissions reduction from shipping under uncertainties[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2015, 40:43-60.
 Nikopoulou Z. Incremental costs for reduction of air pollution from ships:A case study on North European emission control area[J]. Maritime Policy & Management, 2017, 44(8):1056-1077.
 Lamb T. Concepts for ferry propulsion and emissions performance improvement[J]. Journal of Ship Production and Design, 2015, 31(3):170-180.
 Zakaria N M G, Rahman S. Energy efficiency design index (EEDI) for inland vessels in Bangladesh[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2017, 194:362-369.
 Lindstad E, Bo T I. Potential power setups, fuels and hull designs capable of satisfying future EEDI requirements[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2018, 63:276-290.
 Esmailian E, Ghassemi H, Zakerdoost H. Systematic probabilistic design methodology for simultaneously optimizing the ship hull-propeller system[J]. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 2017, 9:246-255.
 Zakerdoost H, Ghassemi H. A multi-level optimization technique based on fuel consumption and energy index in early-stage ship design[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2019, 59:1417-1438.
 Göler H, Erdoğan O. Increasing operational efficiency of high speed RO-RO vessels via new hull coating technologies[J]. 18th Annual General Assembly of the International Association of Maritime Universities, Global Perspectives in MET:Towards Sustainable, Green and Integrated Maritime Transport, Proceedings, 2017, 1:319-329.
 Adland R, Cariou P, Jia H, et al. The energy efficiency effects of periodic ship hull cleaning[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 178:1-13.
 Pagoropoulos A, Kjaer L L, Dong Y, et al. Economic and environmental impact trade-offs related to in-water hull cleanings of merchant vessels[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2018, 22(4):916-929.
 Ančić I, Šestan A. Influence of the required EEDI reduction factor on the CO2 emission from bulk carriers[J]. Energy policy, 2015, 84:107-116.
 Tzannatos E, Stournaras L. EEDI analysis of Ro-Pax and passenger ships in Greece[J]. Maritime Policy & Management, 2014, 42(4):305-316.
 Ekanem Attah E, Bucknall R. An analysis of the energy efficiency of LNG ships powering options using the EEDI[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2015, 110:62-74.
 Sun X, Yan X, Wu B, et al. Analysis of the operational energy efficiency for inland river ships[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2013, 22:34-39.
 Acomi N, Acomi O C. The influence of different types of marine fuel over the energy efficiency operational index[J]. Energy Procedia, 2014, 59:243-248.
 Lu R, Turan O, Boulougouris E, et al. A semi-empirical ship operational performance prediction model for voyage optimization towards energy efficient shipping[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2015, 110:18-28.
 Heitmann N, Khalilian S. Accounting for carbon dioxide emissions from international shipping:Burden sharing under different UNFCCC allocation options and regime scenarios[J]. Marine Policy, 2011, 35(5):682-691.
 Lee T C, Chang Y T, Lee P T. Economy-wide impact analysis of a carbon tax on international container shipping[J]. Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice, 2013, 58:87-102.
 Wang K, Fu X, Luo M. Modeling the impacts of alternative emission trading schemes on international shipping[J]. Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice, 2015, 77:35-49.
 Shi Y. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from international shipping:Is it time to consider market-based measures[J]? Marine Policy, 2016, 64:123-134.
 Fagerholt K, Gausel N T, Rakke J G, et al. Maritime routing and speed optimization with emission control areas[J]. Transportation Research Part C:Emerging Technologies, 2015, 52:57-73.
 Fagerholt K, Psaraftis H N. On two speed optimization problems for ships that sail in and out of emission control areas[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2015, 39:56-64.
 Adland R, Fonnes G, Jia H, et al. The impact of regional environmental regulations on empirical vessel speeds[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2017, 53:37-49.
 Gu Y, Wallace S W. Scrubber:A potentially overestimated compliance method for the emission control areas-The importance of involving a ship's sailing pattern in the evaluation[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2017, 55:51-66.
 Chen L, Yip T L, Mou J. Provision of emission control area and the impact on shipping route choice and ship emissions[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2018, 58:280-291.
 Zhen L, Li M, Hu Z, et al. The effects of emission control area regulations on cruise shipping[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2018, 62:47-63.
 Fan L, Huang L. Analysis of the incentive for slow steaming in Chinese sulfur emission control areas[J]. Transportation Research Record:Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2019, 2673(3):165-175.
 Raza Z, Woxenius J, Finnsgärd C. Slow steaming as part of SECA compliance strategies among RoRo and RoPax shipping companies[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11:1435. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051435.
 Browning L, Hartley S, Bandemehr A, et al. Demonstration of fuel switching on oceangoing vessels in the Gulf of Mexico[J]. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2012, 62(9):1093-1101.
 Chang Y T, Roh Y, Park H. Assessing noxious gases of vessel operations in a potential emission control area[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2014, 28:91-97.
 Svindland M. The environmental effects of emission control area regulations on short sea shipping in Northern Europe:The case of container feeder vessels[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2018, 61:423-430.
 Áström S, Yaramenka K, Winnes H, et al. The costs and benefits of a nitrogen emission control area in the Baltic and North Seas[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2018, 59:223-236.
 Panagakos G P, Stamatopoulou E V, Psaraftis H N. The possible designation of the Mediterranean Sea as a SECA:A case study[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2014, 28:74-90.
 Holmgren J, Nikopoulou Z, Ramstedt L, et al. Modelling modal choice effects of regulation on low-sulphur marine fuels in Northern Europe[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2014, 28:62-73.
 Vierth I, Karlsson R, Mellin A. Effects of more stringent sulphur requirements for sea transports[J]. Transportation Research Procedia, 2015, 8:125-135.
 Zis T, Psaraftis H N. The implications of the new sulphur limits on the European Ro-Ro sector[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2017, 52:185-201.
 Zis T, Psaraftis H N. Operational measures to mitigate and reverse the potential modal shifts due to environmental legislation[J]. Maritime Policy & Management, 2019, 46(1):117-132.
 Zis T, Psaraftis H N, Panagakos G, et al. Policy measures to avert possible modal shifts caused by sulphur regulation in the European Ro-Ro sector[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2019, 70:1-17.